<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday Morning LitLinks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://authorscoop.com/2008/12/30/2546/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://authorscoop.com/2008/12/30/2546/</link>
	<description>The Latest in Literary News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://authorscoop.com/2008/12/30/2546/#comment-4155</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://authorscoop.com/?p=2546#comment-4155</guid>
		<description>Laura Bush should just make it a recipe book.  

In a televised interview on the first day of the RNC convention in 2004, I recall Laura Bush being asked if she ever discussed current events with her husband and she replied something to the effect that she did not because it was not her place to discuss those things.

Laura Bush has nothing to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura Bush should just make it a recipe book.  </p>
<p>In a televised interview on the first day of the RNC convention in 2004, I recall Laura Bush being asked if she ever discussed current events with her husband and she replied something to the effect that she did not because it was not her place to discuss those things.</p>
<p>Laura Bush has nothing to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Haskins</title>
		<link>http://authorscoop.com/2008/12/30/2546/#comment-4152</link>
		<dc:creator>William Haskins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://authorscoop.com/?p=2546#comment-4152</guid>
		<description>i think it will be a rather cynical and bottom-line business model. can they sell it to enough die-hard bush partisans and libraries to turn a profit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it will be a rather cynical and bottom-line business model. can they sell it to enough die-hard bush partisans and libraries to turn a profit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris johnson</title>
		<link>http://authorscoop.com/2008/12/30/2546/#comment-4151</link>
		<dc:creator>chris johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://authorscoop.com/?p=2546#comment-4151</guid>
		<description>The Laura Bush piece highlights for me a weird aspect of publishing -- when a publisher buys a nonfiction book, it's a pig-in-a-poke because there's only the first chapter or two written plus some proposed chapter outlines. With insider/celebrity books it's a tease; they're selling not what they (more likely their ghost writer) has written, but what they might write. It's a very, very weird dance. Fundamentally, though, with this book I think there's truly little or no there there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Laura Bush piece highlights for me a weird aspect of publishing &#8212; when a publisher buys a nonfiction book, it&#8217;s a pig-in-a-poke because there&#8217;s only the first chapter or two written plus some proposed chapter outlines. With insider/celebrity books it&#8217;s a tease; they&#8217;re selling not what they (more likely their ghost writer) has written, but what they might write. It&#8217;s a very, very weird dance. Fundamentally, though, with this book I think there&#8217;s truly little or no there there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

