<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Salinger Suit: A Legal Perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://authorscoop.com/2009/06/22/the-salinger-suit-a-legal-perspective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://authorscoop.com/2009/06/22/the-salinger-suit-a-legal-perspective/</link>
	<description>The Latest in Literary News</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Haskins</title>
		<link>http://authorscoop.com/2009/06/22/the-salinger-suit-a-legal-perspective/#comment-6167</link>
		<dc:creator>William Haskins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://authorscoop.com/?p=5314#comment-6167</guid>
		<description>though he has (supposedly - i haven't seen a source quote) no plans to publish a sequel of his own, i suspect holden has some role on some of the stuff he's written over the past several decades, and would be very interested to see if any excerpts make their way into discovery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>though he has (supposedly - i haven&#8217;t seen a source quote) no plans to publish a sequel of his own, i suspect holden has some role on some of the stuff he&#8217;s written over the past several decades, and would be very interested to see if any excerpts make their way into discovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris johnson</title>
		<link>http://authorscoop.com/2009/06/22/the-salinger-suit-a-legal-perspective/#comment-6166</link>
		<dc:creator>chris johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://authorscoop.com/?p=5314#comment-6166</guid>
		<description>Interesting post. Certainly regarding damages, I agree that an unauthorized sequel is more likely to make money for Salinger than lose it. Salinger's been so hyper-protective over the years of his privacy that I'm surprised he's even doing this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. Certainly regarding damages, I agree that an unauthorized sequel is more likely to make money for Salinger than lose it. Salinger&#8217;s been so hyper-protective over the years of his privacy that I&#8217;m surprised he&#8217;s even doing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

