<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saturday Morning LitLinks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://authorscoop.com/2009/11/21/saturday-morning-litlinks-81/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://authorscoop.com/2009/11/21/saturday-morning-litlinks-81/</link>
	<description>The Latest in Literary News</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Haskins</title>
		<link>http://authorscoop.com/2009/11/21/saturday-morning-litlinks-81/#comment-7547</link>
		<dc:creator>William Haskins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://authorscoop.com/?p=7772#comment-7547</guid>
		<description>the harlequin thing is baffling on many levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the harlequin thing is baffling on many levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Mason</title>
		<link>http://authorscoop.com/2009/11/21/saturday-morning-litlinks-81/#comment-7545</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://authorscoop.com/?p=7772#comment-7545</guid>
		<description>And the fallout from this Harlequin business leads me to wonder how surprised Harlequin can really be - and if they are, why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the fallout from this Harlequin business leads me to wonder how surprised Harlequin can really be - and if they are, why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Mason</title>
		<link>http://authorscoop.com/2009/11/21/saturday-morning-litlinks-81/#comment-7544</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://authorscoop.com/?p=7772#comment-7544</guid>
		<description>For all the entries in the 'bad sex' award shortlist, I wasn't sure Nick Cave's belonged there compared to his competition.  It's a terrible scene, to be sure.  And it has sex in it.  I haven't read the book, but it was the most atmospheric (and repulsive) of the lot.  I don't think that equals bad writing as a matter of axiom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all the entries in the &#8216;bad sex&#8217; award shortlist, I wasn&#8217;t sure Nick Cave&#8217;s belonged there compared to his competition.  It&#8217;s a terrible scene, to be sure.  And it has sex in it.  I haven&#8217;t read the book, but it was the most atmospheric (and repulsive) of the lot.  I don&#8217;t think that equals bad writing as a matter of axiom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

