<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Afternoon Viewing: Fonts and Reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://authorscoop.com/2010/03/13/afternoon-viewing-fonts-and-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://authorscoop.com/2010/03/13/afternoon-viewing-fonts-and-reading/</link>
	<description>The Latest in Literary News</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 09:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Johnson</title>
		<link>http://authorscoop.com/2010/03/13/afternoon-viewing-fonts-and-reading/#comment-8893</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://authorscoop.com/?p=9351#comment-8893</guid>
		<description>That was fascinating, William. Most of my older books, especially the novels I inherited from my parents, have a little blurb (usually at the back) describing in which font the type is set. Publishers don't seem to do that any more -- I wonder why not? I believe Library of America still does it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was fascinating, William. Most of my older books, especially the novels I inherited from my parents, have a little blurb (usually at the back) describing in which font the type is set. Publishers don&#8217;t seem to do that any more &#8212; I wonder why not? I believe Library of America still does it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

