<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday Morning LitLinks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://authorscoop.com/2010/07/22/thursday-morning-litlinks-114/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://authorscoop.com/2010/07/22/thursday-morning-litlinks-114/</link>
	<description>The Latest in Literary News</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Mason</title>
		<link>http://authorscoop.com/2010/07/22/thursday-morning-litlinks-114/#comment-13510</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://authorscoop.com/?p=11281#comment-13510</guid>
		<description>I really don't understand how often we hear of writers making sure that someone sees their work, or know where a cache of it is, but issues a deathbed directive that it never see the light of day.

I understand a memoir having a launch date past when anyone mentioned in it is wormfood, but it's hard to shake off the melodrama of these orders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t understand how often we hear of writers making sure that someone sees their work, or know where a cache of it is, but issues a deathbed directive that it never see the light of day.</p>
<p>I understand a memoir having a launch date past when anyone mentioned in it is wormfood, but it&#8217;s hard to shake off the melodrama of these orders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

